By William C. Dowling
“The item of this book,” writes William C. Dowling in his preface, “is to make the most important strategies of Paul Ricoeur’s Time and Narrative on hand to readers who may need felt bewildered by means of the twists and turns of its argument.” The resources of puzzlement are, he notes, many. For a few, it really is Ricoeur’s famously oblique variety of presentation, within which the polarities of argument and exegesis look so usually and so all at once to have reversed themselves. For others, it's the awesome highbrow variety of Ricoeur’s argument, drawing on traditions as far-off from one another as Heideggerian existentialism, French structuralism, and Anglo-American analytic philosophy. but underneath the labyrinthian floor of Ricoeur’s Temps et récit, Dowling unearths a unmarried prolonged argument that, notwithstanding constructed unsystematically, is intended to be understood in systematic terms.
Ricoeur on Time and Narrative presents that argument in transparent and concise phrases, in a fashion that may be enlightening either to readers new to Ricoeur and those that could have felt themselves adrift within the complexities of Temps et récit, Ricoeur’s final significant philosophical paintings. Dowling divides his dialogue into six chapters, all heavily concerned with particular arguments in Temps et récit: on mimesis, time, narrativity, semantics of motion, poetics of historical past, and poetics of fiction. also, Dowling presents a preface that lays out the French highbrow context of Ricoeur's philosophical approach. An appendix offers his English translation of a private interview within which Ricoeur, having accomplished Time and Narrative, looks again over his lengthy profession as an across the world well known thinker. Ricoeur on Time and Narrative communicates to readers the highbrow pleasure of following Ricoeur’s dismantling of verified theories and arguments—Aristotle and Augustine and Husserl on time, Frye and Greimas on narrative constitution, Arthur Danto and Louis O. Mink at the nature of historic explanation—while coming to determine how, lower than the strain of Ricoeur’s research, those principles are reconstituted and printed in a brand new set of family to 1 another.
"The scholarship in William C. Dowling's Ricoeur on Time and Narrative is impeccable; Dowling is familiar with Ricoeur inside of out. He highlights Ricoeur's most vital arguments, offers them in a limpid, concise language, and hyperlinks them to the proper 19th- and twentieth-century philosophical advancements. Dowling's ebook presents us with a lucid, intelligible model of Ricoeur's significant paintings, one who could be of substantial importance to philosophers, historians, and literary theorists." —Thomas Pavel, Gordon J. Laing uncommon provider Professor of French Literature, and the Committee on Social suggestion, college of Chicago
"William C. Dowling's Ricoeur on Time and Narrative is a sophisticated and remarkably well-sustained piece of labor. It presents an in depth creation to a big paintings of philosophy and narrative theory—already a substantial fulfillment, given the trouble of Ricoeur's textual content. even if, Dowling additionally indicates us, occasionally explicitly, occasionally easily during the method he conducts his argument, why we must always trouble with Ricoeur—what we need to achieve from figuring out him larger than we do, notwithstanding good we might imagine we all know him." —Michael wooden, Charles Barnwell Straut classification of 1923 Professor of English and Comparative Literature, Princeton University